Judge Stearns denied Cisco System’s motion to stay pending inter partes review after Egenera indicated it would voluntarily dismiss, without prejudice, its infringement claims relating to the patent. Because the subject matter of the patent at issue was sufficiently different from that of the other patent-in-suit, Judge Stearns believed that the inter partes review would be unlikely to substantially influence the interpretation of the second patent.
One thought on “Egenera, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc. (16-cv-11613).”